I was in one of those warehouse sized discount stores the other day when I came across a table stacked with books. One of my old favorites jumped right out at me and I picked it up. I was surprised to see a brand new printing of the Jack Kerouac classic On the Road. That book had a major influence on me as a teenager and young man. I remember finding that and copies of Henry Miller’s Tropic of Cancer and Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged in a box of my Mom’s books that was stashed in our basement. These books had all been controversial for different reasons and I remember feeling like I had come across a secret cache of some kind of forbidden fruit.
Kerouac had the idea for On The Road in the late 40’s and finished his first draft on one continuous scroll in 1951, although it wasn’t published until 1957. As I held this new edition in my hand I couldn’t stifle my ironic amusement at seeing the latest edition of On The Road being marketed in a discount store with the phrase “NOW! A MAJOR MOTION PICTURE!” plastered all over the cover, along with glossy photos of the 20-something actors smiling with perfect teeth and stylishly coiffed hair who are presumably playing the roles of Jack Kerouac, Allen Ginsberg and Neal Cassady who were, in fact, unwashed, speed addled, pot smoking, besotted, penniless, rag tag vagabonds and not Barbie and Ken Dolls.
I admit to feeling some consternation that one of my own most revered icons from my wayward youth was NOW! A MAJOR MOTION PICTURE! Sacrilege, I say! Not really, but it’s a little like the way I felt when I figured out there was no Santa Claus, or that my Davy Crockett toys had been sold in a garage sale. The death of the 60’s was hard enough to take back then, but do you have to keep rubbing it in in 2012 by making On The Road into Beverly Hills 90210?
So, they finally came out with a film version of On The Road. Well, it took ’em long enough. Kerouac wrote the thing 61 years ago. By the way, what kind of advertising genius still calls films “motion pictures”? The Golden Age of Hollywood is long gone, my friend. A friend of mine told me today that Allen Ginsberg bobbleheads are part of the marketing campaign. Seriously? Must you? That’s just like pouring salt in the wound. If you’re going to do that, then it seems like a Walt Whitman teddy bear would be huge. Or how about a Charles Bukowski doll that smokes, drinks and curses?
I must admit, I am kind of curious about this “major motion picture.” However, I know I’ll be watching this one at home on Movies on Demand, amongst the trappings of my bourgeois lifestyle as I lay draped in velvet and sipping an insouciant cabernet that doesn’t bite back.
December 8, 2012 at 7:54 pm
Wonderful piece, Michael! You make your points incisively and humorously. Well done
December 8, 2012 at 8:31 pm
Thanks Lawrence. My friend sent me a photo of the Allen Ginsberg bobble head. Better than I might have imagined. I’ll forward it to you!
December 9, 2012 at 11:20 am
Michael. Paul here. I love the irony and imagery-especially your viewing of the ” film” …the sacred as profane is what our times demand-probably because we are bereft as producers of that which might count as sacred. We need to play. Where are the Furies when we need them. ????
December 9, 2012 at 11:52 am
Hi Paul! Thanks so much for your comment! Sending you the rest via e mail.
December 9, 2012 at 1:04 pm
I bought a copy of On The Road at CityLights in San Fran – a fitting place huh – and I’m so glad I got mine there b.c of all the “movie” editions out now. Ugh, I hate book jackets with the movie plastered across the front. I haven’t read it yet but I won’t see the movie until I finish the book. I’m not expecting anything great…but I do love Garrett Hedlund who is playing…someone important and I think he’ll do a good job with the role. But I, I like you, am suspect.
December 9, 2012 at 1:34 pm
Hi Jules! Thanks for reading and weighing in. In all fairness to everybody, who the Hell am I to go all sanctimonious-old-codger waving my cane at these impudent pups and barking at them to get off my memories ~ er, I mean ~ my lawn. I think, as much as anything, I was thoroughly taken aback to see such a commercialized new edition of the book being offered up on an industrial table in a warehouse wholesale store right next to the 55 gallon drums of mayonnaise and the pyramid of institutional sized bales of toilet paper. As a writer, I think you will enjoy the book. It was a reflection of the emerging post World War II zeitgeist and became kind of manifesto for much of the Baby Boom generation. I’m also very jaded and still wincing from the awful interpretation of Hunter S Thompson’s Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. However, as far as film adaptations go, I think James Franco was absolutely stunning as Allen Ginsberg in Howl. I also thought Cloud Atlas was wonderful, and that was an almost impossibly nuanced book to interpret in another medium. Maybe this “major motion picture” will actually surprise. Since I am wrong so often, (multiple times daily ~ but you gotta be willing to strike out lots of times if you expect to hit home runs occasionally) chances are I will be wrong about On The Road. 😉 I hope I am.